Search This Blog

Sunday, December 2, 2012

New Wiki Coffin Mystery

The Beckoning Ice




It is February 1839, and the ships of the United States Exploring Expedition are thrashing about dreaded Cape Horn, on their way to a rendezvous at Orange Harbor, Tierra del Fuego, on a crazy mission to be the first to find Antarctica. A sealing schooner hails the brig Swallow with a strange tale of a murdered corpse on an iceberg--surely a case for Wiki Coffin, half-Maori, half-Yankee "linguister," who is the representative of American law and order with the fleet.

 
But circumstances are against him. As Wiki has been banished from the Swallow to the Peacock,where he is forced to battle racism in the wardroom, and vengeful sealers on the decks, the puzzle is surely too much even for this experienced sleuth. Then Wiki is tested even further when he uncovers a brutal murder on board. To solve this double mystery, Wiki is forced to make a dangerous voyage to the utmost fringes of the beckoning ice.


Available now at Smashwords

It will available soon at Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble, and so forth. However, until December 30, 2012, it can be bought on the Smashwords site for $3.50 -- a 50% saving -- by quoting coupon EV36B

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Wiki Coffin and the Historical Novels Review

Deadly Shoals and a belated rave

Mea culpa.  Until prompted by Linda Collison, author of Barbados Bound and Surgeon's Mate, I had never heard of the Historical Novel Society.

I first joined their Facebook group, and then the Society itself. They have a very swish website, which I scanned, but I was really too busy working up the fifth Wiki Coffin mystery, The Beckoning Ice, to have a proper look. Then a magazine arrived unexpectedly in the mail -- The Historical Novels Review.

I had a look. It has seven interesting articles, two notables being a masterclass in self-editing by the ever-admirable Cindy Vallar, and another a background to Georgette Heyer, by Jennifer Kloester.

The rest is packed with reviews.  Well, I suppose it calls itself a review magazine, but still I was surprised -- partly because I thought all the reviewing was done on the website, and partly because there were no Indie or digital books reviewed, as far as I could tell.

So I commented on it on the Facebook page, and received some very interesting replies.  HNS is supportive of Indie and digital publishing, I was told, but those reviews are on the website. About a third of their members are readers, not writers, and they find the magazine an excellent source when making up their reading lists. And authors and publishers respect the review magazine for their professional reviewing.

So why had I never heard of it?  Why had none of my stellar array of publishers ever mentioned the magazine? As far as I knew, none of my books had been sent to HNR, and they had never been reviewed.

Not so, I was told.  My books have been reviewed, though some of the reviews are not on the website yet.  So why had my publishers never used the reviews for publicity, let alone told me about them?

They must be awfully bad reviews, thought I, and braced myself before searching.

I found only one -- for Deadly Shoals, and to my amazement, it's a rave. Which makes publisher silence even more amazing.  Read on, and tell me what you think.

Off the coast of Patagonia, January 1839: William “Wiki” Coffin, Maori son of a Yankee sea captain, serves as linguist for the U.S. South Seas Exploring Expedition. At the age of twenty-four, he already has an enviable reputation as naval officer and successful detective.

In this, the fourth of Joan Druett’s Wiki Coffin mysteries, Wiki’s orders are to find a stolen ship. Whaling captain Stackpole has paid $1000 for a ship he has yet to see. He and Wiki trek inland along the Rio Negro to find the elusive sales agent, Adams, who, along with the ship, has disappeared. Each step of the investigation is laid out, chapter by well-constructed chapter, to the surprising and satisfying conclusion.

It’s hard to imagine that the author has not spent years sailing on tall ships, so detailed is her description of the vessels and so fluid her maritime dialogue. She spins a great yarn laced with rich landscape detail, character observations, and a wealth of ethnological information – none of which is intrusive or pedantic. There is also a little sub-mystery to solve in Deadly Shoals: who really is the querulous and fiery first mate of the trading vessel, Osprey? This one will make you smile. Actually, the whole book makes you smile appreciatively.

Friday, November 30, 2012

Submitting to Random House digital

From the GalleyCat at MediaBistro.com


Jason Boog reports that Random House has released writer guidelines for four digital imprints, seeking submissions from romance, new adult, mystery, thriller, science fiction, fantasy and horror writers.

Follow these individual imprint links to submit your manuscript: Loveswept (romance & women’s fiction), Alibi (mystery & suspense), Hydra (sci-fi, fantasy & horror), Flirt (new adult). There is no official word count, but the editors are looking for both shorter submissions that range between 15,000 and 30,000 words and longer works that range between 40,000 and 60,000 words. Here’s more from the publisher:
You may present any manuscript in which you control exclusive copyright. We are open to previously-published manuscripts as long as the submitting author now controls all electronic and print publishing rights. Please submit the entire query form at the link below. If we are interested in considering your full manuscript, you will be contacted with further submission instructions. We make every effort to respond to submission inquiries within 2-4 weeks after submission of the submission query form; please do not resubmit previously submitted queries, as this may create delays.

How did they know my name?

Today I received two flyers.

One wanted me to buy a rugby concession ticket, and the other invited me to a supermarket shopping spree.


The difference from the usual mailbox flyer was that they were both headed with my name.

So, how did they know my name is Joan?

Well, it was computer generated, of course.  But it wasn't like that in the old days.

It reminded me (once again) of a particularly dim boyfriend of one of my house mates, back in my youth.  We used to wait for his hilarious pronouncements, such as the suggestion to go to a drive-in movie on a brilliantly sunny afternoon.  But the largest grin occurred the day when I was drinking coffee out of a mug with my name on it.

He said, "Hey, Joan."

"Yes?"

"Your mug has your name on it."

I turned it round, had a good look, and said, "So it has."

"Where did you get it?"

"At the supermarket."

"Wow."  Pause for wonderment. "That's amazing.  But how did they know your name is Joan?" 

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Hobbit Mania

Hobbit hailed as a tourism booster



As the whole world knows, the World Premier of the first of The Hobbit trilogy happened in Wellington last night.

You can read all about it in our paper, the Dominion Post.  Another to marvel about it is the BBC.

Hobbit mania erupted in New Zealand's capital for the world premiere of Peter Jackson's new trilogy.

The first of the three movies - prequels to the Lord of the Rings trilogy - was shown at Wellington's Embassy Theatre on Wednesday evening.

Stars flew in for the event, which saw Wellington rebranded as "the Middle of Middle Earth".

Tens of thousands of fans - some in costume - gathered around the theatre for the screening.

Some camped overnight to secure spots close to the 500m-long red carpet that led to the theatre, which was decorated to look like the entrance to a Hobbit house.


"The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" is the first film of the trilogy, which altogether cost $500m (£312m) to make and was filmed in New Zealand. The second film is set for release in December 2013 and the third in July 2014.

Oscar-winning director Peter Jackson said it was "emotional and very humbling" to see such a crowd.

Wellington City Council put months of planning and just over NZ$1m ($820,000; £512,000) into preparations for the premiere, Radio New Zealand reported, as did tourism officials looking to boost visitor numbers.

Tony Everitt, Asia manager for Tourism New Zealand, told the BBC he expected tourism revenue to rise by as much as US$400m annually because of the films.

The trilogy has taken more than five years to film and hit a number of obstacles. Filming was delayed for months over funding problems and a row over actors' wages - at one point studio executives suggested moving filming to Britain.

Earlier this week, Jackson also rejected claims from animal rights group Peta that up to 27 animals had died during filming, saying no animals were harmed.

In Wellington, however, crowds turned out for a party. Up to 100,000 people were said to have gathered for the premiere.

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Kiwi editor's OED deception

Xenophobe corrupted dictionary
 
 

Robert Burchfield, an eminent former editor of the Oxford English Dictionary covertly deleted thousands of words because of their foreign origins. Worse still, he cast the blame on previous editors, according to claims in a book published this week.

Robert Burchfield's efforts to rewrite the dictionary have been uncovered by Sarah Ogilvie, a linguist, lexicographer and former editor on the OED.

And -- shock, horror! -- he was a Kiwi. Born in Whanganui, New Zealand, of humble beginnings, Burchfield won a Rhodes scholarship to Magdalen College, Oxford, where he was mentored by no one less than JRR Tolkein.
 
He died with a slew of death threats in his mailbox.  Who can wish for a more interesting life than that? 
 
If you don't believe me, read his obituary.

Ogilvie worked for 11 years to research and write Words of the World, published by Cambridge University Press, which challenges the widely held belief that editors of the OED between 1884 and 1933 were Anglocentric Oxford dons obsessed with preserving the Queen's English, and that it was not until Robert Burchfield's four supplements, produced between 1972 and 1986, that the dictionary was opened up to the wider world.

"I observed a pattern, that actually it was the earlier editors who were dealing with words in a really enlightened way. They certainly weren't these Anglocentric, judging kind of editors ­ they were very sensitive to cultural differences and they seemed to be putting in a lot of foreign words and a lot of words from different varieties of English, which must have been amazing for that day when colonial varieties of English were just emerging," said Ogilvie.

She undertook a detailed analysis of Burchfield's supplement, comparing it with the 1933 supplement by Charles Onions and William Craigie. She found that, far from opening up the OED to foreign linguistic influences, Burchfield had deleted 17% of the "loanwords" and world English words that had been included by Onions, who included 45% more foreign words than Burchfield.

Examples of Burchfield's deleted words include balisaur, an Indian badger-like animal; the American English wake-up, a golden-winged woodpecker; boviander, the name in British Guyana for a person of mixed race living on the river banks; and danchi, a Bengali shrub. The OED is now re-evaluating words expunged by Burchfield, who died in 2004, aged 81.

"This is really shocking. If a word gets into the OED, it never leaves. If it becomes obsolete, we put a dagger beside it, but it never leaves,"  Ogilvie said.

In tracing the discrepancy back to its origins, she found that the dictionary's first editor, James Murray, in the 19th century, was harshly criticised for including contributions by correspondents from as far away as Ceylon, Mexico, and New Zealand. One reviewer wrote: "There is no surer or more fatal sign of the decay of a language than in the interpolation of barbarous terms and foreign words."

But Murray pressed on, as, later, did Onions, helped by readers from around the world.

As well as Americanisms and other regional variations in English, there were also those which entered English globally, such as typhoon, okra, abattoir, svelte and bamboo, or those restricted to a particular region, for example pak pai in Hong Kong, which is a car used illegally as a taxi.

 The first version of the OED, released in 1884, contained words from all round the world, from aard-vark and aard-wolf to acacia. Murray also included the rodent, the agouti; the South American howling monkey, the alouatte; and the Philippine textile, abaca.

"If a word was used in an English context, it qualified as an English word.

After all, from the OED's beginnings, it was considered to be a dictionary of the English language, not merely a dictionary written by and for the people of England," said Ogilvie. Murray actually put out a public appeal for English speakers around the world to send him quotations including exotic varieties of English.The myth that the dictionary's early editors were Anglocentric originates, believes Ogilvie, with Burchfield himself.

Twenty new books debut on NYT bestseller list this week

Barbara Hoffert meditates on this Christmas showing in the Library Journal

Perhaps it’s the flood of good books, or just the flood of books, or everyone’s let’s-buy mood now that the holidays are upon us, but the New York Times best sellers lists appearing Sunday, December 2, include an impressive number of titles making their debut on the lists. Vince Flynn’s The Last Man and James Patterson’s Merry Christmas, Alex Cross, in fiction’s first and second spots, respectively, aren’t surprises.

But it’s nice to see less escapist books like Ian McEwan’s ambitious if sometimes troublesome Sweet Tooth and Alice Munro’s ever-charming Dear Life claiming the fourth and 15th spots. At No. 11, Wm. Paul Young’s FaithWords publication, Cross Roads, about a comatose businessman who encounters the Holy Trinity, seems right for the season.

Nonfiction has a real ribbon-and-bows pile of titles, ranging widely from Jon Meacham’s big, bold politician’s story, Thomas Jefferson (No. 2), to Ray Kurzweil’s brainy (human and machine) How To Create a Mind (No. 5), to Fox News host Greg Gutfeld’s The Joy of Hate (now that’s not in the holiday spirit)....

 In nonfiction, Cathy Glass’s Damaged, an account first published in 2007 of a foster mother’s efforts to help an angry eight-year-old whose parents were implicated in a pedophile ring, hit the top espot. Susannah Cahalan’s brave memoir, Brain on Fire, was No. 6; Jake Tapper’s Afghanistan tale, The Outpost, was No. 10; and David McCullough’s The Great Bridge (that’s the Brooklyn Bridge) was No. 21.

There are newbies on the ebook bestseller list too.  Hit the link at the top to read the whole story.

Photo of iceberg that sank Titanic for sale

Picture of the iconic culprit up for bidding


Anthony Castellano reports that an auction house is selling a black and white photo of the iceberg that experts say the Titanic struck shortly before it sank on its maiden voyage.

The photo was taken April 12, 1912, two days before “the unsinkable ship” met her demise when she hit an iceberg shortly before midnight April 14, killing 1,502 people.

The photo shows a huge iceberg with a distinctive elliptical shape. The photograph was taken by the captain of the S.S. Etonian, according to RR Auction of Amherst, N.H.

The caption reads, “Copyright. Blueberg taken by Captain W.F. Wood S.S. Etonian on 12/4/12 [April 12, 1912] in Lat 41° 50 N Long 49° 50 W. Titanic struck 14/4/12 [April 14, 2012] and sank in three hours.”

There were no photos of the iceberg before this one emerged, but two Titanic crew members drew sketches of the iceberg that they saw April 14. Both sketches are similar to the elliptical shape of the iceberg in the photo, according to RR Auction.

The coordinates scribbled on the photograph are not far from where the wreckage of the ship lies on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.

“In my professional judgment, this iceberg is the one that sunk the Titanic,” Titanic artifact collector Stanley Lehrer told the Daily Mail.

Lehrer is noted for his collections of rare Titanic artifacts that have been displayed around the world.
“The captain took the pictures because he was fascinated with the unusual shape of the iceberg. This particular iceberg had an ellipse on the top right of the iceberg,” Lehrer added.

RR Auction expects the photo graph to sell for $8,000 to $10,000 when bidding opens Dec. 13. The photo is one of more than 400 items from the Titanic that are up for bidding.

Monday, November 26, 2012

Giraffe test

Do you have the brain of a four year old? 

 
There are 4 questions. Don't miss one.

1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe, and close the door. This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an overly complicated way.

2 How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?

Did you say, Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant, and close the refrigerator?

Wrong Answer.

Correct Answer: Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe, put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to think through the repercussions of your previous actions.

3. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals Attend ...... Except one. Which animal does not attend?

Correct Answer : The Elephant. The elephant is in the refrigerator. You just put him in there. This tests your memory.  Okay, even if you did not answer the first three questions correctly, you still have one more chance to show your true abilities.

4. There is a river you must cross but it is used by crocodiles, and You do not have a boat. How do you manage it?

Correct Answer:? You jump into the river and swim across. Have you not been listening? All the crocodiles are attending the Animal Meeting. This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.

According to Anderson Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of the Professionals they tested got all questions wrong, but many preschoolers got several correct answers. Anderson Consulting says this conclusively proves the theory that most professionals do not have the brains of a four-year-old.

Laureate slams Nobel winner

Past winner highly critical of "catastrophic" choice


A past winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature has reportedly called this year's choice for the award, China's Mo Yan (pictured) a "catastrophe," and accused him of "celebrating censorship."

Herta Mueller, who won the prize in 2009, has told the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter that she wanted to cry when she heard that Mo was the big choice. "He celebrates censorship. It's extremely upsetting," the Romania-born writer said.

Which reminds me that in October we saw a fine exhibit on the topic of "Censorship" at the Modern Art Gallery of the Queensland Art Gallery in Brisbane.  The text accompanying the exhibit was particularly well written and interesting.  Chinese art featured prominently.

Back in my teenaged years, I devoured The Grapes of Wrath, and Hemingway was up there with Steinbeck.  But I had never even heard of Mo Yan before this latest announcment, and have to confess that I hadn't heard of Mueller, either.

Who, out there, has read Nobel-ranked literature?  Here is a list of past winners, to jog your memory.